Information
Still someone read about Venezuela in ABC? Because if so, let us know, whether left, right, blonde or brunette ...
Suppose that he should make in all sincerity, we would discover in his words, really, and are posing as experts in communication, makes it to find their views reflected . Do not blame this hypothetical person we have in mind. The human mind looks for the economy and profitability of effort, and is, in this sense, "conservative." This is known as the "law of least effort" : when the information that comes to mind and does not match the beliefs we have stored in memory, resolve the conflict in favor of the beliefs or schemas are installed, that is, we deluded or convince himself (as appropriate). We never received a code part: close to the missing information by providing a task and a fundamental weight to our belief, because it is easier not to question ourselves.
is why it is hypocritical to openly brandish arguments as " people are stupid" or "fooled " when in reality it is people "is vague " or better, " hostile to what is different." The information in line with our expectations, the "let go" and we welcome. But what seems inconsistent with our schemes, stereotypes, prejudices, ignore it, at least a priori, we understand it as "suspicious" or simply altered to match our preconceptions.
The American propagandist Walter Lippmann, in 1922, although in a behavioral paradigm now thankfully passed, became very successful and claims as valid today as in its original context upon receipt, the role of mass media, communication psychology of language economy ...
"Our way of social classification is that we define first and then we perceive, not vice versa, as is thought [...]" It is not citizens may be omni, that is, capable of issuing judgments on any social issue [...] "In modern states, decisions are not taken by the interaction of legislatures and the executive, but he and the public opinion [...] "Our views are rebuilding what others have told and we have imagined." "The moral system of each rests on the accepted version of events. We believe in the absolutism of our own vision, and consequently, all opposition seems to us inherently dangerous [...] "This is how capitalism and socialism are separated by a difference of perception, which is imposed by the differences between their models. "
Well, I think pilláis. Is not unique, many others have defined in their respective disciplines (acceptable if they do not fall into determinism, or social scientists or ...)
And responding to the holder, yes, there are still those who read ABC International. 465 comments as demonstrated in the report titled "Chávez warned that repress with weapons like Gaddafi" [27/03/2011].
In a pedantic and eschatological act, I have reviewed this pile of comments, or at least I had time, and I could see (now I am working under my own filters) that ABC hidden messages that are over 10, 15 or Nosecuantos votes. Interestingly, and this can be checked, most of the comments with negative feedback try to argue the blasphemy of ABC, not to insult or other common issues in open forums like this.
But let's focus. The author of this article is malfamada Ludmila Vinogradoff , which among other things has been able to interview military leaders of the revolt of 1992 , even in 1999 seems to have arrived to interview Hugo Chavez . An interview that if she stopped a minute, by their nature anecdotal and historical, we find a parallel debate on how not to interview : seemingly direct style, say from the outset, distortion, dispersion ... Destacdo text than the final
"If 2 or 3 years increasing popular discontent over economic crisis" public use force as in the caracazo? "Do not be so pessimistic. That will not happen ever in Venezuela. I'm sure. "
Forget this face to face the past. As I was saying: this reporter, rightly, has been attacked with different tones and ways on the Internet:
-
Personally, I do not mean anything about the work of Ludmila. Is a person who has developed, only ABC news 164, and already in the 90 worked in the country, and before venezonalos media, so should know more than I do about Chavez and Venezuela .
However, the credibility of Ludmila be easily removed when posting news as toilet paper with pictures of Chavez "[4/17/2010], and saying things like" has sold out in stores in Miami, Mexico, Bogotá and other Latin American cities too, except for Caracas and Havana, where we assume are prohibited. " I understand that humor is a widespread social imperative, but should not overlap within the message as if the humor was the message. Humor is a resource, and Ludmila not know how to use it wisely.
Specifically, ABC news, or together, Ludmila recent publications in the newspaper, which relates to Qaddafi with Chavez at the imaginary axis of socialism collaborative weapons are equally tricky . Both in the news "Chávez strengthens the military as his praetorian guard" [26/03/2011], like the one you sent (the five hundred comments), "Chávez warned that repress with weapons like Gaddafi" [27/03/2011], Ludmila is allowed to speak well (note the developments in the verb forms):
1) Chavez warns not involved in Venezuela and Libya [03/11/1920 ]
2) "... the military becomes a kind of praetorian guard of the commander in chief to defend him in If you lose the elections in 2012 and suppress those who protest as in the Arab riots [26/03/1911 ]
3) A day later, Ludmila is very clear, and we discovered in the change of verb forms: "... repress a popular revolt in Venezuela in a similar way he is doing his friend Muammar Gaddafi in Libya ..." [ 03/11/1927]
Within days, a statement warning Chavez become magically, a clonic news in repression (in fact the only change between a story and other). Speech to the act. But in just 24 hours, the text has gone from a degree of possibility to an absolute conviction. Thus, the few statements verbatim extracts president that the editor are not "statements" but " threats" so that there is a progressive degree of tension. Similarly, if there is violence by rebels in Venezuela, Ludmila and anticipates that Chavez must "suppress the protests," .
To argue that absolute determinism, Ludmila offers no source, context, political and social space and symbolic. Linked the war in Libya with Venezuela's defense policy. Only reinterpretation (and "re" on, as he has invented to taste) of the legislative reforms in Venezuela, and a statement released from the president, are used to justify all the expectations construct.
In this sense, subsumes both Venezuela and Libya to the same public sphere of prejudice, and reifies instrumented with resources such as Chavez's political liturgy (which I always considered reckless and capricious, and I think that this will help to position the reader of my ideological perspective), or the institutionalization of the negative view of rebel the revolution, if left either, of course.
At the imposed ideological superstructure works veteran journalist. But the web of the Internet is, as always, a trap for this type of flies, then, as Gabriel García Márquez would say, "Ethics must accompany journalism as the bluebottle buzz."
If you look back to the masters of the journalistic discourse analysis, can learn much about the subtleties of the media, the graphic elements, the deictic to "make do" and influence the reader's vision ... But all that seems distant and obsolete. In the journalism of the major groups present the crude and coarse raw.
-
I apologize to personally and on behalf of Third Information, in a final review before publishing this text, having used such ambiguous sources and reckless as blog posts. But at the same time I encourage everyone to reflect on the credibility (sometimes, like ABC, can be sensed very easily) from the official media as tools to legitimize political decisions that undermine society. In Third Information too long we fight this media siege, and sometimes we recognize difficulties to innovate, when powerful media groups obsessively repeat the same message. Is insistent that character, among other things, for what we believe in the weakness of this structure. Subscribe
also that we must strive by all to maintain a Opinion International Civil (as I mentioned in other texts) from any special interests ... And if the blogosphere is a reflection of this, let's use it as a source, even if it means a struggle against our prejudices and our laziness. By chance, documents against Ludmila, I found Chavez himself (video at the end of this text) talking about world opinion.
0 comments:
Post a Comment