Sunday, April 3, 2011

Messages To New Born Babies



Monitoring Ignacio Ramonet's article" Libya: The right and wrong "( http://www.aporrea.org/internacionales/a120728.html ) in which the intellectual" left "validates the jargon, the position and the crimes of the fascist world right

For

José Javier León

"Today I'm going to try to sleep at 2 am again, but with the worst de las amarguras... He visto personas matarse unas a otras por dos banderas de un mismo país, una y otra y otra vez durante el tiempo que he estado en Libia. He visto a periodistas mentir a mi lado, no grabar, no escribir, no reportar, hablar de cosas que no ven y me pregunto si esta noche podrán dormir tranquilos.»

Jordan Rodríguez (corresponsal de Telesur), en el post

La estupidez no tiene límites... Bravo al premio Nobe l, http://jordannrodriguez.blogspot.com


  1. Ignacio Ramonet writes: "... the operation Dawn of the Odyssey started on March 19." Following the jargon of the Western media, calling the attack indiscriminate, irrational and criminal "Operation", as if indeed it were a military campaign and also legitimate. Pressure, blackmail, terror, theft, are obscured by the terminology to use, to which the means of right and left indiscriminately join the powers that govern the world. So it is with Serge Halimi on article Rebellion April 1 released today: "The fact that the United States, France and the UK have taken the initiative for a Security Council resolution that authorizes use force against the Libyan regime is not sufficient to disqualify the entry. A rebel movement disarmed and facing a terror regime , sometimes forced to turn to an international police unreliable. "( http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=125645 .)
  2. "The Fall of the Wall of Fear in the Arab autocracies is the contemporary equivalent of the fall of Berlin Wall. " As shown, Ramonet ate the story of "the fall of the Berlin Wall," as if it had been a "triumph" of "freedom." Say how many there are before and after the fall of the wall, is the same as saying that there is a before and after the Twin Towers fell, when there are no doubt caused the collapse, as a prelude to operations that have been happening on the Arab world (Iraq, Afghanistan), of which Libya is just one more chapter, not to mention that the same Gaddafi denounced the involvement of Al Qaida insurgents in military operations. Hence to note the fall of the wall as a global earthquake is not only naive and propaganda, a phrase which today would be confronted with the celebration of 80 years of Gorbachev and his celebrity party. As the political press review-rosa " Among the Hollywood stars Kevin Spacey attended, Goldie Hawn, Milla Jojovich, former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the coach of the England football team, the Italian Fabio Capello, and former British Prime Minister John Major. "( http://www.andina.com.pe/Espanol/Noticia.aspx?Id=6oBkk2i0ntY =)
  3. "... bow of all crises." How's that called to appoint a crisis and covert operations under conducting the U.S. empire and its allies to seize or shamelessly clogging of the oil reserves of Middle East and North Africa? The word crisis here, sounds like the Latin American countries. As false as discuss the political crisis in Honduras, Bolivia the the slaughter of Pando, in Ecuador when Correa coup, or in 2002 - 2003 to Chávez. In neither case is legitimate to talk of 'crisis' politics, this term-really-a euphemism only hides the intelligence operations, intervention, sabotage and terrorism that law rule held in the target countries of their interests. Arming the "rebels" Libyans, train and filter elements of intelligence (just mercenaries) in Libya, has been part of the options put forward by the spokespersons of the "coalition." "That is called" crisis "policy?
  4. "Since the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, the geopolitical doctrine provides that state sovereignty is sacrosanct under the principle of non-interference and a government, regardless of how they came to power, has total freedom to do what they want in their internal affairs. Such
    idea of \u200b\u200bsovereignty, which is still dominant, has eroded its legitimacy from the end of the Cold War in 1989. And in the name of the rights of citizens, and an ethical conception of international relations. "Who would not like to live on the planet where you live Ignacio Ramonet. There exists and it respects the idea of \u200b\u200bsovereignty, now overflowing, he says, for a greater deployment of "civil rights" (to which the State, ie, multinationals, or wipe their ass, especially if it is 'rights' the "citizens" of Europe) and international relations more ethical. Please!
  5. "Dictatorships, whose number is reduced from year to year ..." In this star journalist you should receive an award for ingenuity. What will the regime imposed Mubarak left no more? Or what happened when Wolf, that of Honduras?
  6. "Based on this argument [on respect for citizens' rights], was developed in 1990, the concept of right to intervene or duty of care that led, despite acceptable excuses for front .... " "This is not the legitimacy of current military occupation carried out by the U.S. in countries devastated by natural disasters well either military disaster? When speaking of "acceptable excuses' attempts to assert that there are just reasons to intervene in countries that have the common sense says, the right to solve their problems internally?
  7. "But as tragic failures have not stopped the idea that a more civilized world should be abandoning a concept of internal sovereignty established nearly four centuries in the name of which unelected powers have committed (and commit) countless atrocities against their own people. "If Iraq or Bosnia were mistakes, that does not mean that they can not be corrected, ie if the intervention and the inherent carried out without prejudice to the rights, well, come on humanitarian interventions. Overall, the state was born in Westphalia and is outdated, and now as we all know, those who govern are the transnational corporations over borders and other atavistic nationalists.
  8. attack on Gaddafi's government to its population, Ramonet invented (or rather repeated) phrase curious (or was a translation problem?) The phrase is: "... the insurrection Tripoli, broadcast by dozens of eyewitnesses ..." What does this mean? It was actually broadcast by eyewitnesses? Someone or something transmitted, but was subsequently re-transmitted by witnesses? "Witnesses of what? What transmission? What facts? And all these, the images were the only such witnesses and relied on these "blindly" Ramonet. On the other hand, compare the "Tripolitazo" with the Caracazo serves to approve two experiences totally different. In Venezuela, by that time, hunger was such that segments of the population opted for dog food, not nearly the situation in Libya. Ramonet yes, use that example to get us a goat or a pig in a poke. Wants to legitimize its interventionist discourse that painful concerning NATO, but only to move to the left, and Venezuela in particular, to set up against a wall of silence and complicity final for Dawn Operations that have no other objective to give free oil to Europe to mention a military-political presence in Africa to reaffirm its hegemony in the region counterfeit. This criminal is hiding behind the shysters of the intervention to prevent crimes against Libyans.
  9. addition, Ramonet does not address the media blow dealt by Telesur, which denied the bombing, and showed quite the opposite of what the journalist says star Le Monde, the joy and the defense of people of Tripoli to his boss's defense that it has been an eyewitness to our ambassador in Libya, Tripoli precisely. No one has seen pictures of the "brutal" crackdown, but reliable sources are - and how not to trust them! - NGOs that are responsible to ensure human rights (especially if you defend these rights produces returns to multinational food, energy, medicines, etc.).
  10. Here are some quotes that realize the accuracy of the sources where they feed on texts such as Ramonet, revered journalistic institution, " In Tobruk near the Egyptian border, ten Egyptians were shot dead by armed gangs of Libyan mercenaries," said an Egyptian physician citing compatriots who had fled the war-torn country. '"On the other end of the country, Tunisians who fled Libya reported that police officers had deserted Zaouia and that this town 60 km west of Tripoli was plunged into chaos ":" A total of 208 people have died since Tuesday to Sunday in the protests against the regime of Gaddafi in Libya , according to the news website of the opposition Libya Al Youm, coinciding with the figures provided by the Arabic channel Al Jazeera. ":" Witnesses told that the city has become a "war zone" over forbidden to journalists. ". "According to information somewhat fragmentary and uncertain coming from Libya, Muammar Gaddafi's regime crumbles: multiply the protests ":" Gaddafi has flatly denied the news that grabbed the media half the world [is supposed to "news" is that I've been outlining means half the world "] and reported the bombing of Tripoli areas taken by insurgents as well as the use of tanks in eastern populations of the country, but later threatened asserting:" We have not used force, but we will if necessary . " `' only through the Internet have been leaked pictures of the crackdown on protests in Libya , which have killed at least 4 people and injured dozens. `' According to the company with US-based Arbor Networks, the Internet service was cut on Friday in Libya', ' Witnesses in the area informed the Qatari Al Jazeera that there are many dead bodies lying on the streets of Janzur, on the outskirts of Tripoli. ";" "The savage repression of the security forces against peaceful demonstrators reveals the reality of the brutality of Muammar Qaddafi against internal opposition," complained Sarah Leah Whitson, head for the Middle East and North Africa at Human Rights Watch, an NGO based in New York. " I can go on quoting ad infinitum / ad nauseam , and nowhere find anything serious about the alleged bombing the Libyan people by Gaddafi's troops.
  11. O yes, there is something 'serious': one of the reports of the envoys of Telesur, the Rid litchi. His words were used to confirm the 'alleged' Gaddafi attacks. Read how it addresses the situation: " The problem for journalists is in Tripoli. In the area of \u200b\u200bthe country are only allowed supervised and controlled by the Government. Libya is a country where journalists before or came only when it suited the Government and was to publish for them, "he said. "So in this liberated zone (Benghazi) never felt so welcomed ... villagers were not used to seeing free journalists. It's very different rules in the area where Gaddafi " he said the correspondent of the international news channel of the Venezuelan State. On the complaints of human rights violations against the regime, said " has been an amazing thing " because people "talk crimes against humanity . There are actually a lot of overwhelming evidence that Qaddafi ordered his security forces to attack and shoot at unarmed protesters and fired to kill. " Benghazi: liberated area. Free Journalists. On the dead, watch not only what she says but how says, "has seen something amazing ... because people speaks of crimes against humanity "... He saw with astonishment what was said, that is, makes it certain, as if he had seen with his own eyes, what they say. Journalist ethics (if that can talk yet) or you can go down the drain. "This conflict began with peaceful demonstrations and went back and protesting a quiet town, and across the armed forces with heavy weapons shooting to kill ... that's what everyone says here therefore speak of crimes against humanity. " That is the confirmation message that everyone is talking about the comments ... rejoice!
  12. "In Benghazi, to defend against the brutality of the crackdown, a group of protestors stormed an arsenal of the local garrison and seized thousands of small arms." What a good example! Take weapons arsenal and entered a shot against government forces. Doing so is protest. The innocence and desperation of this act of rebellion was understood when the rebel vanguard is accompanied nothing more and nothing less than bombing NATO. That leaders have called for a transitional government that was quickly endorsed by the military powers that a few days of bombing had been meetings to negotiate with Qatar Petroleum, said the "spontaneity" of the rebellion ... "The " government "temporary the Libyan rebels said today that it has signed an agreement with Qatar to export crude and now have a capacity of producing one million barrels a week. "( http://www.mundo.com/ultimas-noticias/rebeldes-libios-revelan-acuerdo-con-qatar-para-exportar -oil- 13,762)
  13. "This lazy jácara of \\" American plot \\ "..." How wonderful! Now American intervention is clearly a story, a story, an invention, and which is worn by Ramonet ... Haiti ... If you tell
  14. "Not a sentence of regret to a people in revolt against a military tyrant who commands fire on their own citizens. No reference either to the famous dictum of the Liberator Simón Bolívar: \\ "Cursed be the soldier who turns up arms against his people, \\" fundamental doctrine of the Bolivarian revolution. »Search Ramonet twist the position of Chavez, who has a strong influence in the Arab world and in this particular case on Libya his position, indeed, the clearest and most forceful of the planet. Chavez gets you weed your misrepresentation of the Caracazo, and now quoting Bolivar. The commander must be alert against this sibilant.
  15. This "entry" of The Country is an example of porn journalism these days: "Just come independent information from Libya, but they do speak of a progression revolt. The BBC quoted witnesses in Tripoli recounting heavy fighting between anti-government protesters and supporters of Muammar Gaddafi. Human rights organizations Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International are acting as spokesperson for what happens in the country under a dictatorship for 42 years. HRW manages the only figure with a certain band of officers: 73 dead. The Government has provided no figure has not made any comments on violence in the country. According to Al Jazeera, Saif al Islam Gaddafi, the son of Libyan leader is to deliver a televised speech tonight on the government network. "Yes, just get information and witnesses, the same" eye "of Ramonet- are evidence of the massacre. Sure, the media censorship imposed by Gaddafi is understood if this crap they call journalism. However, the country opened to Western television networks, including Telesur, and the bombing of civilians, as later confirmed from Russian sources, did not exist. All these lies will not only serve Ramonet to talk nonsense, but to say seriously that the International Criminal Court used to something and has standing to bring an astonishing speed to the fire Qaddafi, while Bush Jr. , to name a genocidal beast, you can still calm.
  16. "In this context of urgency [the Benghazi clamoring for military intervention], the Security Council UN adopted on March 17, 1973 resolution establishing a no-fly regime in Libya to protect civilians and to stop the fighting (24). already know what to expect from an international fashion plate when here in the coming months, the desperate opposition assaulting a cache of weapons to defend themselves against genocidal repression of Chávez, and cries out to Marines stationed on the beaches almost Venezuela, which intervene humanely while them (from Maracaibo, from Anzoátegui, from Táchira, from Merida) advance towards the capital. Without a single image (or invented as Llaguno Bridge), eyewitnesses will tell the world that Chavez killed hundreds in one day, all helpless and giving pity, because in Venezuela there is freedom of expression, as evidenced the closure of RCTV and 49 radio stations nationwide. None of this is true no matter when the issue is to impose a resolution to come to save the lives of Venezuelans who awoke from tyranny. Aznar anyway, and is asking the same medicine to Cuba ...
  17. "It may be against the current UN structure, or to estimate their performance leaves much to be desired. Or that the Western powers dominate the organization. Criticisms are acceptable. But for now, the UN is the only source of international law. "Criticisms are acceptable! UN the only source of international law! Could it be that they are reading like me? How do you interpret this? Can you be so servile and keep performing in the social forums, with the popular movement against the Bolivarian revolution, as a leftist intellectual?
  18. " The European Union in particular has a special responsibility in this matter. Not only military. "Ignacio Ramonet is set a fine example of the criminal thesis, European fountain of Just War. I do not think I need say no more. The disgust he gives is indescribable.


View:

"The just and the unjust" Ramonet, http://www.aporrea.org/ideologia/a120747 . html

0 comments:

Post a Comment